In some countries, criminal organizations have captured parts of the polity, influencing the allocation of public funds to their activities and promoting leniency acts. These tactics vary across countries and institutional regimes, and often depend on the intensity of political competition and electoral systems. In some countries, governments actively support organized crime by allowing their leaders to obtain political power and influence the criminal economy. But there is no clear-cut answer to topportal this question.
Research examining criminal networks is crucial. There are various analytical techniques that measure the degree of connectivity between organized crime groups. Automated Social Network Analysis (SNA) and Priority-First Search, two of the most widely used by non-governmental organizations, can help determine the degree of interconnection. The first of these approaches is based on the concept of social capital. According to Cohen and Prusak, social capital is a network of connections, trust, and mutual understanding among individuals.
Another important role played by organised crime is in the legal economy. OC structures affect US authorities from the early 1900s to the 1970s, when large cities were populated by organised crime. In addition to causing damage to the legal economy, OC raises a vast amount of money. These proceeds are then disguised as investments and flow into the legal economy. In 2009, these illicit activities generated $2.1 trillion in proceeds, including $1.6 trillion that was reinvested in the legal economy.
The question of whether a government supports organized crime is difficult to answer. There are several aspects of organized crime that need to be considered, but most researchers agree on the following four basic elements. For example, the term organized crime is broadly defined as “criminal organizations that seek to increase their income”.
In some cases, governments may encourage and even encourage OC groups to operate. In Kyrgyzstan, for instance, organized crime groups have emerged alongside the official government and are considered a shadow state that meets the criteria of the corporate approach. In this context, organized crime is often accompanied by police violence, which explains the emergence of OC groups. However, governments must not make such decisions unilaterally.
Many criminal organizations have political agendas and can influence the outcome of elections. This can make governments’ policies against leniency less effective. By investing in the legal economy, criminal organisations can influence political outcomes. Further, they can increase the level of social consensus in a jurisdiction. The political consequences of criminal activities may be difficult to measure, but the evidence suggests that governments support criminal activities through their investments. The broader political benefits of criminal activity may justify the underlying policy of legality.
The financial activities of organized crime can affect all citizens’ basic rights. They affect economic growth, peace and order, and good government. Though the effects of illicit activity are not always immediately visible, they are felt by all Canadians. Victims suffer, because their health insurance rates skyrocket and the government is forced to cut social programs. Furthermore, organized crime undermines Canadian institutions and consumers. As a result, no community is immune from the effects of this crime webtoon.
